Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists and hyperkalemia monitoring in chronic kidney disease patients associated with type II diabetes: a narrative review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent complication of Type II diabetes (T2D). The coexistence of CKD with T2D is comparable to cardiovascular disease (CVD) when the estimated glomerular filtration rate declines below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Screening and early detection of people with high risk for CKD would be beneficial in managing CKD progress and the associated complications such as CV complications. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) have demonstrated beneficial effects in delaying CKD progression, but they carry the risk of hyperkalemia. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (nsMRA), such as finerenone, exhibit considerable efficacy in their anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and renal protective effects with demonstrable reductions in CV complications. In addition, nsMRAs do not cause significant changes in serum potassium levels compared to traditional steroidal MRA. Ongoing research explores the capacity of the sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), combined with nsMRA, to produce synergistic renal protective effects and reduce the risk of hyperkalemia. Also, a dedicated renal outcomes study (FLOW study) involving a once-weekly injectable Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, semaglutide, was halted early by the data monitoring committee due to having achieved the predefined efficacy endpoint and considerations related to renal disease. In CKD patients with T2D on nsMRA, hyperkalemia management requires a comprehensive approach involving lifestyle adjustments, dietary modifications, regular serum potassium level monitoring, and potassium binders, if necessary. Withholding or down-titration of nsMRAs with close monitoring of serum potassium levels may be required in patients with concerning potassium levels. In light of the current state of knowledge, this review article explores the perspectives and approaches that HCPs may consider when monitoring and managing hyperkalemia in CKD patients with T2D.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a common and serious problem among people with Type II Diabetes (T2D). People who have CKD with T2D are at a higher risk for heart disease after normal kidney function declines below certain levels. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are a group of medications that can help delay CKD progression but may cause a rise in circulating potassium levels. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist (nsMRA), such as finerenone, can reduce kidney inflammation and damage, with noted cardiovascular benefits, and with less effect on serum potassium levels as compared to their steroid-based counterparts. Researchers are studying whether combining blood sugar medications such as sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and finerenone can help protect the kidneys and heart. They also want to see if this combination can prevent high potassium levels. This article talks about ways to check and monitor potassium levels in CKD patients with T2D who may be taking nsMRA. To manage high potassium levels in people with CKD and T2D, doctors may suggest lifestyle changes, dietary adjustments, potassium-lowering medication, or adjustment of other medications with close monitoring of potassium levels.

Efficacy and safety of aldosterone synthase inhibition with and without empagliflozin for chronic kidney disease: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Excess aldosterone accelerates chronic kidney disease progression. This phase 2 clinical trial assessed BI 690517, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, for efficacy, safety, and dose selection. METHODS: This was a multinational, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. People aged 18 years or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30 to less than 90 mL/min/1·73 m2, a urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) of 200 to less than 5000 mg/g, and serum potassium of 4·8 mmol/L or less, taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 8 weeks of empagliflozin or placebo run-in, followed by a second randomisation (1:1:1:1) to 14 weeks of treatment with once per day BI 690517 at doses of 3 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg, or placebo. Study participants, research coordinators, investigators, and the data coordinating centre were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in UACR measured in first morning void urine from baseline (second randomisation) to the end of treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05182840) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 18 and Dec 30, 2022, of the 714 run-in participants, 586 were randomly assigned to receive BI 690517 or placebo. At baseline, 33% (n=196) were women, 67% (n=390) were men, 42% (n=244) had a racial identity other than White, and mean participant age was 63·8 years (SD 11·3). Mean baseline eGFR was 51·9 mL/min/1·73 m2 (17·7) and median UACR was 426 mg/g (IQR 205 to 889). Percentage change in first morning void UACR from baseline to the end of treatment at week 14 was -3% (95% CI -19 to 17) with placebo, -22% (-36 to -7) with BI 690517 3 mg, -39% (-50 to -26) with BI 690517 10 mg, and -37% (-49 to -22) with BI 690517 20 mg monotherapy. BI 690517 produced similar UACR reductions when added to empagliflozin. Investigator-reported hyperkalaemia occurred in 10% (14/146) of those in the BI 690517 3 mg group, 15% (22/144) in the BI 690517 10 mg group, and 18% (26/146) in the BI 690517 20 mg group, and in 6% (nine of 147) of those receiving placebo, with or without empagliflozin. Most participants with hyperkalaemia did not require intervention (86% [72/84]). Adrenal insufficiency was an adverse event of special interest reported in seven of 436 study participants (2%) receiving BI 690517 and one of 147 participants (1%) receiving matched placebo. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION: BI 690517 dose-dependently reduced albuminuria with concurrent renin-angiotensin system inhibition and empagliflozin, suggesting an additive efficacy for chronic kidney disease treatment without unexpected safety signals. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

10-month retrospective study on compliance and tolerability of the drospirenone-only pill.

OBJECTIVE: The current study evaluated menstrual bleeding profiles, compliance and tolerability in women using a drospirenone (DRSP)-only pill. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a non-interventional, retrospective, multi-center study on healthy female adults [n=276, aged between 18 and 53 years and premenopausal using a DRSP-only pill for at least six months with a mean duration of 10.4 months (+/-SD 4.0) months]. 75.6% used other contraceptives than POP before starting with the DRSP-only pill. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the bleeding profile. 56.5% of the women had associated cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-two (262) women (mean age of 32.5 ± 9.1 years; mean BMI of 23.1 ± 3.8 kg/m²) were eligible for analysis. 42.6% of the users had a scheduled bleeding, 33,3% unscheduled bleeding and 48% no bleeding during the last evaluable cycle. 75.4% evaluated the bleeding profile in the last cycle as very good or good, 13.8% said there was no change since starting the medication, 8.4% declared the profile was bad and 2.3% as very bad. 87.8% of the users evaluated the general satisfaction of the contraception as very good or good, whereas only 8.8% and 3.4% said there was no change or that it was bad. No women evaluated the general satisfaction as very bad. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the DRSP-only pill is associated with a very high satisfaction as a contraceptive in general and in the individual bleeding profile. These aspects reaffirm the acceptability not only in women with cardiovascular risk factors.

Diferencias de género en la titulación de fármacos de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca y fracción de eyección reducida del ensayo ETIFIC / Gender differences in drug titration among heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in the ETIFIC trial

Introducción y objetivos El tratamiento óptimo disminuye la mortalidad y hospitalizaciones por insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) en pacientes con IC y fracción de eyección reducida. En los ensayos clínicos las mujeres estuvieron infrarrepresentadas y no fueron evaluadas específicamente. Este estudio buscó comparar la seguridad y efectividad de titulación (ajuste de dosis) de fármacos en mujeres y varones. Métodos Estudio post hoc de género del ensayo aleatorizado multicéntrico ETIFIC. Se incluyeron pacientes hospitalizados con IC de novo y fracción de eyección reducida. Proceso estructurado de titulación en unidades de IC. Objetivo principal: la dosis relativa media de bloqueadores beta (% de la dosis objetivo) alcanzada por mujeres frente a varones. Objetivos secundarios: dosis relativas medias de otros fármacos de IC, eventos adversos y resultados clínicos a 6 meses. Resultados Se incluyeron 320 pacientes, 83 (25,93%) mujeres y 237 (74,06%) varones. (76 frente a 213 analizados). Media±desviación estándar de dosis relativa de bloqueadores beta mujeres frente a varones: 62,08±30,72% frente a 64,4±32,77%; diferencia −2,32%; IC95%, −10,58-5,94; p=0,580, antagonistas del receptor de mineralocorticoides 79,85±27,72% comparado con 67,29±31,43%; p=0,003, sin diferencias significativas en dosificación de otros fármacos. El análisis multivariante no encontró diferencias significativas. Mortalidad cardiovascular 1 (1,20%) frente a 3 (1,26%), p=1 y 0 hospitalizaciones por IC (0,00%) frente a 10 (4,22%), p=0,125. Conclusiones En un análisis post hoc del ensayo ETIFIC de titulación en IC no encontramos diferencias de género significativas en dosificación, mortalidad cardiovascular y hospitalizaciones por IC (AU)

Introduction and objectives Optimal medical therapy decreases mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Women have been underrepresented in clinical trials and not specifically evaluated. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of drug titration in women vs men. Methods This post hoc gender study of the ETIFIC multicenter randomized trial included hospitalized patients with new-onset HF with reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association II-III and no contraindications to beta-blockers. A structured 4-month titration process was implemented in HF clinics. The primary endpoint was the mean relative dose (% of target dose) of beta-blockers achieved by women vs men. Secondary endpoints included the mean relative doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, adverse events, and other clinical outcomes at 6 months. Results A total of 320 patients were included, 83 (25.93%) women and 237 (74.06%) men (76 vs 213 analyzed). The mean±standard deviation of the relative doses achieved by women vs men were as follows: beta-blockers 62.08%±30.72% vs 64.4%±32.77%, with a difference of−2.32% (95%CI,−10.58-5.94), P = .580; and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 79.85%±27.72% vs 67.29%±31.43%, P =.003. No other differences in drug dosage were found. Multivariate analysis showed nonsignificant differences. CV mortality was 1 (1.20%) vs 3 (1.26%), P=1, and HF hospitalizations 0 (0.00%) vs 10 (4.22%), P=.125. Conclusions In a post hoc analysis from the HF-titration ETIFIC trial, we found nonsignificant gender differences in drug dosage, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalizations (AU)

Long-term mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism after targeted treatments.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term outcomes (especially mortality and/or major cardiovascular events (MACE)) of the unilateral primary aldosteronism (uPA) patients who underwent medical or surgery-targeted treatment, relative to those with essential hypertension (EH), have been scarcely reported. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Using the prospectively designed observational Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation cohort, we identified 858 uPA cases among 1220 primary aldosteronism patients and another 1210 EH controls. EXPOSURES: Operated uPA patients were grouped via their 1-year post-therapy statuses. RESULTS: Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome clinical complete success (hypertension remission) was achieved in 272 (49.9%) of 545 surgically treated uPA patients. After follow-up for 6.3 ± 4.0 years, both hypertension-remissive (hazard ratio (HR): 0.54; P < 0.001) and not-cured (HR: 0.61; P < 0.001) uPA patients showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality than that of EH controls; whereas the not-cured group had a higher risk of incident MACE (sub-hazard ratio (sHR), 1.41; P = 0.037) but similar atrial fibrillation (Af) and congestive heart failure (CHF). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)-treated uPA patients had higher risks of MACE (sHR: 1.38; P = 0.033), Af (sHR:1.62, P = 0.049), and CHF (sHR: 1.44; P = 0.048) than those of EH controls, with mortality as a competing risk. Using inverse probability of treatment-weighted matching and counting adrenalectomy as a time-varying factor, treatment with adrenalectomy was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.57; P = 0.035), MACE (HR: 0.67; P = 0.037), and CHF (HR: 0.49; P = 0.005) compared to those of MRA therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenalectomy, independent of post-surgical hypertension remission, was associated with lower all-cause mortality of uPA patients, compared to that of EH patients. We further documented a more beneficial effect of adrenalectomy over MRA treatment on long-term mortality, MACE, and CHF in uPA patients.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists use in patients with heart failure and impaired renal function.

AIMS: Impaired renal function is a major contributor to the low proportion of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Our aims were to investigate the impact of MRA treatment on all-cause mortality and worsening renal function (WRF) in patients with HFrEF and moderately impaired renal function. METHODS: Retrospective data between 2010-2018 on HFrEF patients from a single-centre hospital with estimated glomerular renal function (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were analysed. WRF was defined as a decline of by eGFR ≥ 20%. RESULTS: 416 patients were included, 131 patients on MRA and 285 without MRA, mean age was 77 years (SD ± 9) and 82 years (SD ± 9), respectively. Median follow-up was 2 years. 128 patients (32%) experienced WRF, 25% in the MRA group and 30% in patients without MRA (p = 0.293). In multivariable analysis, hospitalization for heart failure and systolic blood pressure were associated with WRF (p = 0.015 and p = <0.001), but not use of MRA (p = 0.421). MRA treatment had no impact on the risk of adjusted all-cause mortality (HR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.32 p = 0.685). WRF was associated with increased adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.89 p = 0.014). Use of MRA did not increase the adjusted overall risk of mortality even when experiencing WRF (HR 1.15; 95% CI, 0.81-1.63 p = 0.422). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of elderly HFrEF patients with moderately impaired renal function, MRA did not increase risk for WRF or all-cause mortality.

An evaluation of KBP-5074 in advanced chronic kidney disease with uncontrolled hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Resistant hypertension (RH) is more prevalent in the advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and contributes to a greater likelihood of poor cardiovascular and renal outcomes. However, RH often goes untreated in this population as the currently available recommended add-on therapy, steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) such as spironolactone and eplerenone, may lead to unacceptable side effects, mainly hyperkalemia in a cohort with reduced kidney function. KBP-5074 is a novel non-steroidal MRA that addresses the unmet need of treating RH in the CKD population without hyperkalemia. AREAS COVERED: We provide an overview of the current state of RH treatment in stage 3B/4 CKD as it relates to available steroidal MRAs and the current limitations of this treatment. We then explore the emerging data on nonsteroidal MRAs, particularly the novel agent KBP-5074 and its applicability to treatment in this context. EXPERT OPINION: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, the novel nonsteroidal MRA KBP-5074 demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety in treating RH in stage 3B/4 CKD and offers a potential new treatment option in this population at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CKD progression.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Pathway and Its Antagonism in a Model of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Diabetic retinopathy remains a major cause of vision loss worldwide. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) pathway activation contributes to diabetic nephropathy, but its role in retinopathy is unknown. In this study, we show that MR is overexpressed in the retina of type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats and humans and that cortisol is the MR ligand in human eyes. Lipocalin 2 and galectin 3, two biomarkers of diabetes complications regulated by MR, are increased in GK and human retina. The sustained intraocular delivery of spironolactone, a steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist, decreased the early and late pathogenic features of retinopathy in GK rats, such as retinal inflammation, vascular leakage, and retinal edema, through the upregulation of genes encoding proteins known to intervene in vascular permeability such as Hey1, Vldlr, Pten, Slc7a1, Tjp1, Dlg1, and Sesn2 but did not decrease VEGF. Spironolactone also normalized the distribution of ion and water channels in macroglial cells. These results indicate that MR is activated in GK and human diabetic retina and that local MR antagonism could be a novel therapeutic option for diabetic retinopathy.

Overall and bleeding-related discontinuation rates of a new oral contraceptive containing 4 mg drospirenone only in a 24/4 regimen and comparison to 0.075 mg desogestrel.

OBJECTIVES: Progestin-only pills do not increase the risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke, and myocardial infarction but are associated with poor cycle control. A novel estrogen-free pill containing only drospirenone (DRSP) to improve bleeding patterns and tolerability and reduce discontinuation rates has been introduced into the market. The present study aims to describe the improvement in the acceptability of this DRSP-only pill, e.g. regarding the bleeding profile and the reduction in discontinuation rates due to unacceptable bleeding compared to desogestrel (DSG). STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, double-dummy prospective phase III study in healthy women aged 18-45 years evaluating a total of 858 women with 6691 DRSP and 332 women with 2487 DSG treatment cycles. RESULTS: Overall, 82 (9.6%) women in the DRSP group and 44 (13.3%) women in the DSG group experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to premature termination of the trial meaning that 32% more women in the DRSP group finished the trial in comparison to the DSG group (based on the AUC of Kaplan-Meier's curves). Discontinuation rates due to abnormal bleeding were 3.7% for DRSP and 7.3% for DSG users. This is a 55.7% lower discontinuation rate in the DRSP group compared to the DSG group. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the improvement in acceptability and bleeding profile of women using the new DRSP-only oral contraceptive compared to DSG, providing a better quality of life and adherence to the contraceptive method as demonstrated by lower discontinuation rates of women using the estrogen-free DRSP-only pill.

Effects of Repeated Oral Administration of Esaxerenone on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam in Healthy Japanese Males.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Esaxerenone showed the potential to inhibit and induce activity against cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A in in vitro studies. We investigated whether repeated administration of 5 mg/day esaxerenone for 14 days influences the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a sensitive CYP3A substrate, in healthy Japanese males. METHODS: This single-centre, open-label, single-sequence study had two administration periods: period 1: single oral dose of 2 mg midazolam (day 0); period 2: repeated oral doses of 5 mg/day esaxerenone for 14 days, with a single oral dose of 2 mg midazolam on day 14. Full pharmacokinetic profiles of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam on days 0 and 14 and safety data were obtained. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints for midazolam were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to time of the last measurable concentration (AUClast), AUC from zero to infinity (AUCinf), and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). RESULTS: The study included 28 male subjects. One subject was withdrawn because of a mild adverse event (increased hepatic enzyme levels) that resolved without intervention. Repeated administration of esaxerenone increased midazolam AUClast, AUCinf, and Cmax by about 1.2-fold (1.201, 1.201, and 1.224, respectively) compared with administration of midazolam alone. However, repeated administration of esaxerenone did not affect the elimination half-life of midazolam (2.86 versus 2.63 h with and without esaxerenone). There were no safety concerns associated with concomitant administration of esaxerenone and midazolam. CONCLUSIONS: Esaxerenone 5 mg/day had no clinically significant effect on midazolam pharmacokinetics and was not associated with any safety issues. Esaxerenone can be concomitantly administered with drugs of CYP3A substrates without dose adjustments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapiCTI-152832.

Heart failure medication dosage and survival in women and men seen at outpatient clinics.

OBJECTIVE: Women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) may reach optimal treatment effect at half of the guideline-recommended medication dose. This study investigates prescription practice and its relation with survival of patients with HF in daily care. METHODS: Electronic health record data from 13 Dutch outpatient cardiology clinics were extracted for HF receiving at least one guideline-recommended HF medication. Dose changes over consecutive prescriptions were modelled using natural cubic splines. Inverse probability-weighted Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between dose (reference≥50% target dose) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The study population comprised 561 women (29% HFrEF (ejection fraction (EF)<40%), 49% heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (EF≥50%); HFpEF and 615 men (47% and 25%, respectively). During a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 252 patients died (48% women; 167 HFrEF, 84 HFpEF). Nine hundred thirty-four patients (46% women) received ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), 795 (48% women) beta blockers and 178 (42% women) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). In both sexes, the mean target dose across prescriptions was 50% for ACEI/ARBs and beta blockers, and 100% for MRAs. ACEI/ARB dose of <50% was associated with lower mortality in women but not in men with HFrEF. This was not seen in patients with HFpEF. Beta-blocker dose was not associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with HF seen in outpatient cardiology clinics receive half of the guideline-recommended medication dose. Lower ACEI/ARB dose was associated with improved survival in women with HFrEF. These results underscore the importance of (re)defining optimal medical therapy for women with HFrEF.

The LIFT trial: study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of K+-binder Lokelma for maximisation of RAAS inhibition in CKD patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: CKD is common in heart failure (HF) and associated with morbidity and mortality, yet life-prolonging medications such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi) are underused due to risk of hyperkalaemia. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a potassium-binding medication that has been shown to reduce incidence of hyperkalaemia in CKD, non-CKD, and HF populations, which we propose will support maximisation of RAASi therapy. METHODS: We propose a 1:1 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which participants will receive either SZC or placebo. We will up-titrate participants' RAASi therapy while monitoring their serum potassium levels and adjusting their SZC dose if necessary. Participants with CKD and HF will be recruited from CKD and HF clinics at St George's Hospital. The total study period will be 18 months; 130 participants will be enrolled for approximately two months each following screening. Our primary outcome will be the proportion of participants who achieve maximum RAASi dose while maintaining normokalaemia. Secondary outcomes include participants reaching maximum RAASi dose without severe hyperkalaemia; time from randomisation to hyperkalaemia; time from randomisation to severe hyperkalaemia; number of RAASi dose escalations per participant; final doses of RAASi therapy; changes in quality of life score, eGFR, ACR, serum sodium, troponin T; number and duration of hospital admissions; and within-participant change in serum potassium compared to baseline. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to examine the use of SZC for the maximisation of RAASi dosing in patients with advanced CKD and HF. We will assess the impact of achieving target RAASi dosing on hospital admission rates and duration of stay, with the hope that optimum RAASi treatment will translate into reduced morbidity and improved QoL. If clinical benefit is demonstrated, we hope that the joint multidisciplinary CKD-HF approach will be expanded. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2020-002946-18. Registered on 08 June 2020. Online record pending.

Role of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy Doses and Optimization in Patients Hospitalized With Decompensated Systolic Heart Failure.

Despite significant advances in evidence-based treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the use of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) at recommended doses remains suboptimal. We examine the usage and modification of inpatient GDMT and its effect on outcomes in patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute on chronic HFrEF between 2013 and 2018. Overall use and modification of GDMT, which included heart failure appropriate beta-blockers (BB), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and aldosterone blockers (MRA) during the hospitalization were collected. Target dosages were based on guideline recommendations. Primary endpoints included 30-day hospitalization-free survival and 1-year survival. Among 1,655 patients, discharge use of BB, RASi, and MRA was 73.4%, 55.9% and 13.8%, respectively. Upon discharge, ≥50% target dose of BB, RASi, and MRA was used in 25.3%, 15.6%, and 13.7%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, there was a statistically significant improvement in 1-year survival and 30-day hospitalization-free survival in patients discharged on increasing number of medication classes optimized at ≥50% target dose (per extra medication, HR 0.74, 0.64-0.86, p <0.001, and HR 0.73, 0.62-0.86, p = 0.0002), respectively. Initiation and/or uptitration of BB and RASi was associated with improved 30-day hospitalization-free survival and 1-year survival, (HR 0.73 (0.57-0.92), p = 0.0087; HR 0.62 (0.46-0.82), p <0.001) for BB and (HR 0.77 (0.62-0.95), p <0.001; HR 0.62 (0.48-0.80), p <0.001) for RASi, respectively. In conclusion, inpatient optimization of GDMT in acute HFrEF is feasible and associated with improved 30-day hospitalization-free survival and 1-year survival.

Report from the CVOT Summit 2020: new cardiovascular and renal outcomes.

The 6th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit "Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes 2020" was the first to be held virtually on October 29-30, 2020. As in previous years, this summit served as reference meeting for in-depth discussions on the topic of recently completed and presented major outcome trials. This year, focus was placed on the outcomes of VERTIS-CV, EMPEROR-Reduced, DAPA-CKD, and FIDELIO-DKD. Trial implications for diabetes management and the impact on new treatment algorithms were highlighted for diabetologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, and general practitioners. Discussion evolved from major outcome trials using SGLT-2 inhibitors for treatment and prevention of heart failure and chronic kidney disease in people with and without diabetes, to additional therapy options for chronic kidney disease with a novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, challenges in diabetes management like COVID-19 and obesity, as well as novel treatment strategies and guidelines, were discussed.The 7th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit will be held virtually on November, 18-19, 2021 ( http://www.cvot.org ).

Striatin genotype-based, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist-driven clinical trial: study rationale and design.

OBJECTIVES: In human studies and genetically altered mouse studies, variants in the striatin gene (STRN) are associated with increased blood pressure (BP) and aldosterone on a liberal salt diet. This clinical trial is based on the presumed mechanism for striatin-associated HTN - increased aldosterone. It is designed to determine if participants with the STRN risk alleles will have a greater BP reduction on a liberal salt diet with a specific, mechanism-based therapy - a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone - as compared with a nonspecific anti-hypertensive therapy - amlodipine. METHODS: One hundred five hypertensive adults with the STRN risk alleles (SNP rs2540923 carriers or rs888083 homozygotes) will be enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, dose-escalation, clinical trial. After a minimum 2-week washout period and baseline assessment of BP on a liberal salt diet, participants will be randomized to either daily eplerenone or amlodipine. Participants will take daily at-home BP recordings as a safety check. After 4 and 8 weeks of drug therapy, BP will be measured by the study team and medication will be increased, if needed, to achieve a participant goal BP of <140/90 mmHg.Anticipated results We anticipate that STRN risk allele carriers will demonstrate a greater reduction in BP with eplerenone and will require a lower dose of eplerenone to reach goal BP as compared with amlodipine. CONCLUSION: This is a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Positive results support the feasibility of performing genetically-defined, mechanistically-driven trials in HTN. Clinically, it would suggest that genetic biomarkers can identify individuals highly responsive to specific treatment.

Determination of finerenone - a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist - in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in venous and capillary human plasma.

A straightforward and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay allowing the sensitive and selective quantitation of finerenone (BAY 94-8862) in lithium heparin human plasma is described. Finerenone is a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of chronic kidney disease. Finerenone quantitation is performed after addition of its stable isotope-labelled internal standard (ISTD) by protein precipitation with acidified acetonitrile followed by HPLC-MS/MS separation and detection. The determination of finerenone concentrations was validated for a plasma volume of 0.100 mL and subsequently also for a lower plasma volume of 0.010 mL, collected e.g. in paediatric studies. The analytical range was from 0.100 µg/L (lower limit of quantification) to 200 µg/L (upper limit of quantification). Inter-day accuracy was 99.7-105.0% for the plasma volume of 0.100 mL and 101.1-104.5% for the plasma volume of 0.010 mL. Inter-day precision was ≤ 7.0%, independent of the extracted plasma volume. A moderate, concentration-independent matrix effect on ionisation was observed for both finerenone and its ISTD of 0.535-0.617, which is fully compensated by the ISTD (ISTD-normalised matrix factors were 0.98-1.03). The assay was successfully applied with both validated plasma volumes to a clinical phase I study in which the pharmacokinetics of 20 mg finerenone were compared in capillary plasma (0.010 mL) and venous plasma (0.100 mL) in a concentration range from the lower limit of quantification to 310 µg/L (capillary plasma) and 252 µg/L (venous plasma). The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve was similar in both matrices, while maximum concentrations were 37% higher in capillary plasma. In conclusion, capillary sampling should not bias pharmacokinetic exposure estimates compared with venous plasma values, if limited to sampling times in the distribution and elimination phases of finerenone.

Lipid-based nano-formulation platform for eplerenone oral delivery as a potential treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: in-vitro optimization and ex-vivo assessment.

PURPOSE: Eplerenone (EPL) is a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist used for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy which characterized by accumulation of subretinal fluid causing a localized area of retinal detachment. unfortunately, EPL suffers from poor oral bioavailability due to poor aqueous solubility in addition to high hepatic first pass metabolism. METHOD: Aiming to improve its oral bioavailability, EPL-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were prepared by the emulsification solvent evaporation method and in-vitro evaluated for particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential (ZP), and entrapment efficiency (EE%). A D-optimal design was used for study the effect of liquid lipid to solid lipid ratio, surfactant type and percentage on PS, PDI, EE%, and for data optimization. The optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system was further evaluated using in-vitro drug release and ex-vivo permeation studies through rabbit intestine in comparison to EPL aqueous suspension. The physicochemical properties of the drug in the optimized system were further examined using FT-IR and X-ray diffraction studies. RESULTS: The resultant NLCs showed small PS (100.85-346.60 nm), homogenous distribution (0.173-0.624), negatively charged particles (ZP -20.20 to -36.75 mV), in addition to EE% (34.31-70.64%). The optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system with a desirability value of 0.905 was suggested through the Design expert® software, containing liquid to solid lipid ratio (2:1) in presence of 0.43%w/v Pluronic® F127 as a surfactant. The optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system showed a PS of 134 nm and PDI of 0.31, in addition to high EE% (76 ± 6.56%w/w), and ZP (-32.37 mV). The ex-vivo permeation study showed two-fold higher drug permeation through rabbit intestine compared to that from the aqueous drug suspension after 24 h, confirming the ability of optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system as successful oral targeting delivery carrier. CONCLUSION: Our results pave the way for a new oral nanotherapeutic approach toward CSCR treatment. In-vivo study is currently under investigation.

Interplay of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Empagliflozin in Heart Failure: EMPEROR-Reduced.

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors favorably influence the clinical course of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to study the mutual influence of empagliflozin and MRAs in EMPEROR-Reduced (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction). METHODS: Secondary analysis that compared the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo in 3,730 patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction, of whom 71% used MRAs at randomization. RESULTS: The effects of empagliflozin on the primary endpoint, on most efficacy endpoints, and on safety were similar in patients receiving or not receiving an MRA (interaction p > 0.20). For cardiovascular death, the hazard ratios for the effect of empagliflozin versus placebo were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 1.05) in MRA users and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.82 to 1.71) in MRA nonusers (interaction p = 0.10); a similar pattern was seen for all-cause mortality (interaction p = 0.098). Among MRA nonusers at baseline, patients in the empagliflozin group were 35% less likely than those in the placebo group to initiate treatment with an MRA following randomization (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.85). Among MRA users at baseline, patients in the empagliflozin group were 22% less likely than those in the placebo group to discontinue treatment with an MRA following randomization (hazard ratio: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.96). Severe hyperkalemia was less common in the empagliflozin group. CONCLUSIONS: In EMPEROR-Reduced, the use of MRAs did not influence the effect of empagliflozin to reduce adverse heart failure and renal outcomes. Treatment with empagliflozin was associated with less discontinuation of MRAs. (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [EMPEROR-Reduced]; NCT03057977).

The safety and efficacy of low-dose mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in dialysis patients: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in dialysis patients. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries for clinical trials on the use of MRAs in dialysis patients. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to analyze relevant data and evaluate the quality of evidence. RESULTS: We identified nine randomized controlled trials including 1128 chronic dialysis patients. In terms of safety, when hyperkalemia was defined as serum potassium level ≥5.5 mmol/L, low-dose MRAs were significantly associated with hyperkalemia (relative risk [RR] 1.76, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.07-2.89, P = .02); however, when hyperkalemia was defined as serum potassium level ≥6.0 mmol/L or serum potassium level ≥6.5 mmol/L, no significant association was observed between low-dose MRAs and hyperkalemia (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.83-2.37, P = .20; RR 1.98, 95% CI 0.91-4.30, P = .09, respectively). Use of low-dose MRAs can reduce cardiovascular mortality by 54% compared with the control group (0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.76, P = .003). Similarly, the RR of all-cause mortality for the low-dose MRAs group was 0.48 (95% CI 0.33-0.72, P = .0003). CONCLUSION: Low-dose MRAs may benefit dialysis patients without significantly increasing moderate to severe hyperkalemia.